Indicator

Recency of Arrival:
Though immigration has slowed nationwide, California continues to be home to large communities of both new and long-settled immigrants.

Each indicator page features a series of charts, insights and analysis, case studies, resources, and related indicators.

Insights and Analyses

  • The length of residency of California’s immigrant population varies by racial group. Data from 2021 showed that among Latino immigrants, a larger share (57%) moved to the U.S. more than 20 years ago. Among Black immigrants, a larger share (60%) immigrated to the U.S. within the past 20 years.

  • Among Black immigrants, a majority of Belizean, Haitian, and Jamaican immigrants living in California have been in the U.S. for more than 20 years.

  • Among Asian American immigrants, most Southeast Asian immigrants, including, Vietnamese, Cambodian, Hmong, and Lao immigrants have lived in the U.S. for more than 20 years, as many were resettled in the U.S. following wars in their home countries in the 1970s.

  • While many Californians come from Asia and Latin American and have lived here for decades, more recent immigrants also hail from these regions. In recent years, larger numbers of immigrants have arrived from countries like India and China. Since 2021 there has also been an increase in the number of immigrants coming from Latin American countries, according to data from the Migration Policy Institute.

  • Since 2022 and as of February 2024, Texas Governor Greg Abbott transported over 102,000 migrants to other cities across the U.S. Between June and November 2023, it was estimated that about 1,000 migrants were transported to Los Angeles.

  • Although seeking asylum is a human right under U.S. law, the federal government has continued to restrict this right at the southern border. Following the end of the Title 42 order in May 2023, President Biden established the Circumvention of Lawful Pathways Rule (CLP), otherwise known as the transit ban. This establishes a presumption that an individual is ineligible for asylum unless they are granted parole prior to their arrival in the U.S., presented themselves at the border at a pre-determined time and place, or were denied protection in a third country. However, legal advocates have sued the Biden administration, noting the illegality of this rule and the violation of protections for migrants who are fleeing precarious and life-threatening circumstances. Further, legal advocates have also proposed attainable approaches to manage migration at the southern border such as expanding lawful pathways for people to enter the U.S. and equipping cities with the necessary resources to support recent arrivals. As litigation continues, the asylum transit ban remains in place.

  • Undocumented immigrants, many who are long-settled and have established families and networks, face the imminent threat of deportation. In 2021, about 69% of undocumented Californians had been living in the U.S. for more than a decade.

  • Length of residency impacts an individual’s likelihood and eligibility to naturalize, which can explain why a large share of the naturalized population has been living in the U.S. for many years. Statewide, as of 2021, about 51% of naturalized citizens had been living in the U.S. for more than 30 years.

Advocates fight for accountability and the closure of California’s private, for-profit immigration detention facilities, which are known to be abusive and lack humane conditions for those in custody.

California ranks third in the country in total number of migrants held in detention, with an immigrant detention population of over 3,100 people awaiting a determination of their immigration status or deportation. All of California’s six ICE detention facilities are run by the private, for-profit prison companies GEO Group and CoreCivic, which immigrant rights organizations such as ACLU say are prone to a lack of accountability amid repeatedly documented cases of severe abuse and neglect in detention centers. Previous attempts to prohibit private immigration detention facilities in the state were signed with the passage of AB 32 in 2019, until it was federally challenged and found unconstitutional, resulting in the state being unable to ban for-profit ICE detention facilities.

Due to the lack of standards, regulation, and oversight of private detention centers, in June 2025, advocacy organizations such as ACLU, Detention Watch Network, and National Immigrant Justice Center have called for congress to conduct oversight of immigrant detention that is rife with unchecked abuse. This comes amidst years of advocacy from immigrant rights groups like the Asian Law Caucus and senators calling for an end to the abuse, of which most cases are allegedly not investigated. An August 2025 report launched by Senator Jon Ossoff investigated the detention centers and identified 510 credible reports of human rights abuses which include deaths, mistreatment pregnant women, unsanitary living conditions, denial of access to attorneys, and denial of access to necessary follow-up care and doctor appointments for detained children with ongoing treatment for cancer or recovery from brain surgery, and more.

For California specifically, a California Department of Justice report on mental health from April 2025 cited instances of deficient recordkeeping and maintenance of health care files, overuse of force on detainees with mental health conditions, and more found happening at every detention center. A 2023 report by the Shut Down Adelanto Coalition, led by the Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice and comprising of over 20 organizations, compiled experiences of abuses and conditions from current detainees at the Adelanto and Desert View facilities. The Shut Down Adelanto Coalition has also exposed and advocated for the improvement of hazardous environmental coalitions inside the detention center, claiming that at least eight people have died in ICE custody at the facility. The Coalition’s advocacy led to an investigation and 2021 report by the US Environmental Protection Agency confirming the use of a harmful pesticide in unventilated spaces within the detention center during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. The group has also exposed illnesses caused by poor water and air quality in the facility and broader community, with one detained immigrant calling the local water supply “contaminated.”

As of June 2025, a new facility is planned to be the largest in the state, drawing residents both local and throughout the state to express their opposition. The Dolores Huerta Foundation called out the plans as it redirects investment from addressing the needs of the local community to enabling and profiting off the detainment and dehumanization of people. Read the CA Department of Justice report here. Read Senator Jon Ossoff’s report here.

Photo credit: Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice

cidp icij rapid v1 cropped

Launched in 2015 by the Black LGBTQIA + Migrant Project (BLMP), Familia: Trans Queer Liberation Movement (Familia: TQLM), Mijente, and the Transgender Law Center (TLC), the #EndTransDetention campaign is advocating for the release of transgender and queer migrants in detention.

According to a 2024 report by the Williams Institute, there are an estimated 41,000 transgender immigrants in California – over a quarter of the state’s total adult trans population. While seeking asylum in the U.S. after fleeing persecution, violence, or torture – often on account of their sexual or gender identity – many transgender and queer migrants are detained at the border. Reports from Human Rights Watch in 2016 and Physicians for Human Rights in 2024 (among many others) detail the ongoing inhumane and violent conditions imposed upon transgender migrants, in particular, in detention centers in California and the U.S. as a whole. These injustices can lead to fatal consequences for migrants like Roxsana Hernández, whose death in 2018 led to renewed social media advocacy under the #EndTransDetention banner. The campaign also successfully advocated for the 2021 release of Eva Rosas, a Mexican transgender woman who had been detained for two years. #EndTransDetention advocacy for migrants like Roxsana and Eva is ongoing on organizational social media platforms.

Transgender and queer migrant advocacy organizations like BLMP, Familia: TQLM, Mijente, and TLC have also taken their advocacy in recent years to the streets and into halls of power. In 2022, the #NoPrideinDetention campaign saw organizations bring their message to Pride parades and festivals around the country, and Familia: TQLM Executive Director Jennicet Gutiérrez publicly rejected a White House Pride invitation from then-President Biden to protest his administration’s migrant detention policies. In 2025, these organizations continue to push back against heightened deportations by the Trump administration and the recent Supreme court ruling that upholds discriminatory laws that denies lifesaving healthcare to trans youth. Beyond policy advocacy, the organizations mentioned in this case study provide numerous resources to support transgender and queer immigrants like housing, translation services, pro bono legal services, financial support, and development of deportation defense campaigns.

To learn more about the #EndTransDetention campaign visit their site here, and read BLMP’s press release here. To learn more about the issues transgender and queer migrants face in detention centers, read the Human Rights Watch Report here and the Physicians for Human Rights report here. To read about TLC, Familia: TQLM, and BLMP’s work, visit their sites.

Photo credit: Paolo Riveros

cidp familia action org photo cropped

Resources

Made possible by


© 2024 California Immigrant Data Portal. All rights reserved.